Arguably you need people and projects with strong vision to improve the way we work. The world is full of projects like that, open source or not. The GNOME folks seem to have strong opinions about where they want to take the project, and aren't afraid to make it happen, even if the changes are disruptive. Since when has it been okay to tell people what to do, unless you're paying them to do what you want? And if not, please take the initiative of getting in touch with someone and letting them know of your concern about X, Y, or Z applications.įor some reason, if Apple were to up and remove the system tray in their next macOS update, it would be lauded as "brave, bold, and forward-thinking", but even a well-written and clearly-explained article isn't enough to stop the dog pile for G3. It's possible that they're already working with the upstream applications that you're already deemed impossible to work with, and fixes will be provided. In many cases applications won’t have to make any changes, and if changes are required we have hopefully contacted you already. > Having reviewed how applications are using status icons, we are confident that the majority of applications that use status icons will not be impacted by the decision not to display them by default. It's not about them just throwing a dart and removing the topic lands on, but the fact that almost nobody uses them. However, you're also given the freedom of using it if you so want it. Including TopIcons is antithetical to the whole point of eliminating tray icons entirely, which is what this explains.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |